Construction of Suicide Net Begins on Golden Gate Bridge

By http://www.sandiegopsychiatricsociety.org/author
September 28, 2018
Pyschiatric News
By Linda M. Richmond
Sept 13, 2018

 

Construction of a suicide-deterrent net is under way at the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco. It is hoped to end the bridge’s standing as one of the world’s most popular suicide sites.

Seventy-nine years after the first call to action to erect a barrier on the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco, construction on a suicide deterrent is at long last under way.

Above is a rendering of the suicide-deterrent net now being built on the Golden Gate Bridge. The design is meant to deter people from not only jumping from the bridge but also thinking of the bridge as a suicide site in the first place.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The number of completed suicides at the Golden Gate Bridge has risen to about 35 per year, about a 30 percent increase in the past decade or so, along with a similar rise in the national suicide rate. Psychiatrists and relatives of the bridge’s suicide victims hope the movement to erect suicide deterrents at key locations will catch on in other communities around the country.

The Golden Gate Bridge is a 1.7-mile long suspension bridge considered one of the top engineering marvels in the world. But it also has a darker side as one of the world’s most frequent sites for suicide, with more than 1,700 confirmed deaths since its opening in 1937. The hope is that all this will soon change.

Now, workers have begun closing some traffic lanes at night to truck in materials and over the next month will begin installing scaffolding that will support construction of a net that is forged of marine-grade woven steel, nearly seven football fields long, that will jut out 20 feet over the water.

The net will be gray, designed to blend in with the fog for which San Francisco is well known. It will be positioned a full two stories—20 feet—below the bridge’s sidewalk and roadway surface so it will not be visible to motorists or pedestrians crossing the bridge. It is hoped that it will deter people from not only jumping but also coming to the bridge with suicide in mind, said Paolo Cosulich-Schwartz, spokesperson for the Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District.

The Golden Gate’s system is expected to cost $211 million, with funding cobbled together from local, state, and national government sources as well as donations from the public. Paul Muller, president of the Bridge Rail Foundation, which works to prevent suicide from bridges and other public structures, said he has gotten dozens of emails and calls from other communities interested in installing similar nets, and some want to use the Golden Gate project as a gauge of potential costs.

“That’s not appropriate at all,” he said. Construction costs are typically higher in the Bay Area, and this project also includes four new permanent, movable scaffolds and other upgrades, such as a wind-resistance system, that other bridges would probably not need.

The Golden Gate system was modeled after similar suicide-deterrent nets erected at a medieval castle in Bern, Switzerland, and over five of the bridges that crisscross the Cornell University campus in Ithaca, N.Y. The Golden Gate net will be the largest of its kind, however. Such nets have been very successful in deterring suicide at those sites, Cosulich-Schwartz said.

Psychiatrist Calls on Colleagues to Work to Build Suicide Deterrents in Their Communities

San Francisco psychiatrist Raymond Zablotny, M.D., spent more than a decade working to gain approval for a suicide barrier on the Golden Gate Bridge. Now, he wants to encourage psychiatrists around the country to identify other suicide trouble spots in their communities and work to have barriers erected there, too.

“We hope we’ve helped set a precedent,” Zablotny said. “This is important community work for us to be involved in.”

For Zablotny the work to gain approval for the suicide barrier was personal: “On February 1, 2005, we lost our 18-year old son—a senior in high school—to the bridge,” he said.

His son, Jonathan, was a senior at a local private high school and had wrestled with suicidal thoughts in middle school but seemed to have overcome them. He had close friends and could captivate an audience in drama classes. He had a talent for science but struggled with anxiety surrounding schoolwork and didn’t always get his homework done.

The week before his death, the teen had failed to complete a major school paper. On the last day of his life, he packed his school bag and headed out the door, but instead of walking a few blocks to his school, he headed to the bridge instead. “No one ever expects it,” Zablotny said of his son’s death. “Best I could tell, he didn’t have one of the major mental disorders.”

Just like his son, the bulk of the Golden Gate’s suicides are pedestrians, and the vast majority—95 percent—live in the Bay Area, research has shown. A last-minute design decision lowered the rails on the bridge’s pedestrian walkways to just four feet to preserve the stunning views.

“From day one, it was a suicide magnet,” Zablotny said of the bridge. “It even has its own parking lot and bus service.” One jumper reportedly left a note that read “Why do you make it so easy?”

Together with other psychiatrists and suicide experts, Zablotny spent time pouring over the literature on suicide. “We realized that we’re not very good at predicting or preventing suicide, except in one area, and that is preventing access to easily available means,” he said. But gaining approval for the suicide barrier required convincing the bridge board, the public, and other state and national politicians of this fact, and that proved no easy task.

Year in and year out, the survivors group, a dozen or so family members and friends of people who had lost their lives to the bridge, were relentless about attending the board meetings of the Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District, Zablotny recounted. Again and again, they told their loved ones’ stories and held enlarged photographs of those who had been lost to the bridge.

When efforts to raise funds from major corporate donors failed because they did not want to be associated with the stigma of suicide, proponents of building the barrier began to lobby members of Congress. Eventually, they secured a change to federal transportation laws to allow funding for a suicide prevention project.

For Zablotny, his work to have a suicide barrier built and the triumph of its approval has been a healing journey. One of the biggest arguments against the barrier had been the concern that it would disturb the beauty of the bridge. His response was simple. “Great beauty isn’t really beautiful if it leads to something like suicide.”

The steel nets are meant to dash the illusion of a peaceful drop into the water, “not to provide a soft, cushy landing for would-be jumpers,” Cousulich-Schwartz said. “We’re trying to make the act of suicide harder and less appealing.” Jumpers are highly likely to break bones—or be rendered immobile—after hitting the steel net.

“This barrier will save many lives,” said Mel Blaustein, M.D., who has led the Northern California Psychiatric Society’s task force to get a suicide barrier erected since 2004. “You will look down and see a 20-foot drop, a pretty painful drop. That’s a remarkable deterrent.” People who are suicidal want to escape pain or avoid pain, he said. Witnesses have seen people run across the traffic on the bridge to avoid getting hit by a car—only to leap over the rail and jump, he explained.

Blaustein, who is director of psychiatry at nearby St. Francis Memorial Hospital, frequently treats patients who have been hospitalized after being removed from the bridge. “A couple of days later, they say ‘What was I thinking?’ Once deterred, the impulse is over.”

He has also interviewed three people who have survived a suicide jump off the bridge. “As soon as they were in freefall, they all said they were thinking, ‘Oh no, what am I doing? I wish I wasn’t doing this. I wish I could live. Please, God, somebody save me.’ ”

When people decide to die by suicide, they use the method with which they are most comfortable, Blaustein added. “If you take away their preferred method, they don’t go somewhere else.” A 1978 study of 515 people who attempted suicide from the Golden Gate Bridge but were restrained from doing so found that 90 percent of them did not go on to die by suicide or by other violent means. Other studies have reported similar findings.

With decades of attempts to get a barrier erected, how did it finally get funded and approved? Bay Area psychiatrists and mental health professionals for years presented decision makers with information about “the nature of suicide and the research showing the benefit of restricting access to lethal means,” Muller said.

Another key to the ultimate success of the campaign was the powerful testimony from the Bridge Rail Foundation’s survivors group—those who had lost loved ones to the bridge. “They brought the needed intensity and passion,” he said.

The Golden Gate’s system is expected to be completed by January 2021. ■

 

 

 

Category:


Leave a Reply